|
Charities change roles by turning a
profit
USA Today Mar 26, 1996; Bill Shore
Abstract:
Working with business, and learning
to think like one, is a necessary step in meeting increasing
social-service demands; Bill Shore, founder of Share Our Strength,
a Washington-based anti-hunger nonprofit, is author of Revolut
ion of the Heart.
Even though Democrats and Republicans disagree
about the role of the federal government in solving the nation's
social ills, they do agree that nonprofits must take up more
of the burden. Yet America's nonprofits do not have the resources
to solve the huge social problems faced by our communities.
Now, more than ever, nonprofits need to find new ways to raise
revenue.
Over the past five years, Share Our Strength,
a national anti-hunger group, has developed a groundbreaking
partnership with American Express based upon its corporate
values. The Charge Against Hunger campaign helps achieve several
objectives for American Express: Employees become involved
in local communities, American Express is identified as a
good corporate citizen, and the company builds better relationships
with the merchants who take its card by working together in
a good cause.
Full Text:
Copyright USA Today Information Network
Mar 26, 1996
Working with business, and learning to think
like one, is a necessary step in meeting increasing social-service
demands; Bill Shore, founder of Share Our Strength, a Washington-based
anti-hunger nonprofit, is author of Revolut ion of the Heart.
Traditionally, America's nonprofits are
rich in compassion and idealism, but they are entrepreneurially
bankrupt.
They're stuck settling for leftover wealth
-- the excess funds people and companies donate after their
primary needs are met. Depending on leftovers to fight poverty
or promote economic development is about as effective as trying
to move a truck by asking passersby to push -- what you need
is a powerful engine.
As nonprofit organizations in every American
community are scrambling to bridge gaps in federal social
spending, they're turning to the business sector, not for
donations but to create their own sources of revenue -- their
own engines.
The most innovative ideas are emerging from
unlikely places. An order of Roman Catholic priests produced
a feature film, Care of the Spitfire Grill, that just captured
the Sundance Film Festival audience award. The $4 million
profit from its sale to Castle Rock Entertainment will help
to support the social-service programs of the church.
Likewise, five of the nation's largest black
churches recently united to form the Revelation Corporation
of America -- a business that will use its profits to make
home mortgages and fund new-home construction in minority
neighborhoods. Profits from 20 million church members' purchases
of discounted groceries, clothing and insurance will go to
create the loan and building funds.
The Roman Catholic priests and the African-American
churches are only the most recent evidence of a burgeoning
movement -- a profound but little-noticed trend bringing new
vitality and desperately needed resources to the fight for
better social services.
Even though Democrats and Republicans disagree
about the role of the federal government in solving the nation's
social ills, they do agree that nonprofits must take up more
of the burden. Yet America's nonprofits do not have the resources
to solve the huge social problems faced by our communities.
Now, more than ever, nonprofits need to find new ways to raise
revenue.
Not all nonprofits may be ready to leap
into business, but increasingly many businesses are ready
to get involved in ``socially responsible marketing.'' Ben
and Jerry's Ice Cream, Anita Roddick's Body Shops and American
Express all have raised money for charity by earmarking a
percentage of profits for social causes.
Over the past five years, Share Our Strength,
a national anti-hunger group, has developed a groundbreaking
partnership with American Express based upon its corporate
values. The Charge Against Hunger campaign helps achieve several
objectives for American Express: Employees become involved
in local communities, American Express is identified as a
good corporate citizen, and the company builds better relationships
with the merchants who take its card by working together in
a good cause.
Once nonprofit leaders begin to think like
business executives, they'll be able to forge relationships
that benefit both the public and private sectors.
Then they can take this approach a step
further. In fact, a new breed of entrepreneurs is doing just
that -- completely re-inventing the nonprofit sector by creating
new wealth.
A nonprofit that creates wealth sounds like
a contradiction in terms, but it doesn't have to be. In growing
numbers, new entrepreneurial organizations, like the priests'
and black churches', are emerging as hybrids -- profit-seeking
firms with a social cause. They might better be called community
wealth enterprises -- CWEs -- because their profits, rather
than lining the pockets of individuals, are returned to the
community.
The most well-known example of this phenomenon
is Paul Newman's food company, Newman's Own. One hundred percent
of after-tax profits from the sale of salad dressing, tomato
sauce and popcorn is donated to a wide array of charitable
causes.
By creating new wealth and returning it
directly back to the community, CWEs are less vulnerable to
what philanthropies call ``compassion fatigue.'' And because
they create new wealth, community wealth enterprises also
increase commerce, adding to the economy's growth, just as
any for-profit business would.
Some businesspeople argue that nonprofits
have an unfair competitive advantage because they are not
paying taxes. At the same time, some nonprofit executives
fear the loss of their nonprofit, tax-exempt status.
There is no doubt that, as the wall between
nonprofit and for-profit continues to crumble, the nation's
tax laws will need to be examined and revised. If a nonprofit
is earning a profit, it is only fair -- under current law
-- that it should pay taxes.
However, legislators may decide that preferential
tax treatment for organizations that direct all of their profits
back into the community is good public policy.
Of course, nonprofit organizations should
raise every private and public dollar they can. But they should
not limit themselves to philanthropic dollars. Nonprofits
that rely solely on government funds, charitable solicitations
and foundation grants are redividing the ever-shrinking philanthropic
pie rather than taking steps to create a bigger one.
If nonprofits are going to fill even some
of the holes left to them by federal spending cuts and escalating
social problems, they must become nonprofits for profit.
Giving good business
Corporate sponsorship of charities is a
growing part of many companies' marketing programs. One successful
program, The Charge Against Hunger, one of the largest corporate-giving
programs, primarily sponsored by American Express, has attracted
numerous other companies to help. They've raised more than
$5 million each of the last 3 years.
Return to the News
Menu
|